The National Trial Lawyers
Avvo Rating 10.0
Avvo Clients' Choice
Avvo Rating Superb
Expertise Badge
Avvo Clients' Choice

Understanding Possession with Intent to Sell

The Law Office of Matthew Galluzzo, PLLC Team

Criminal Possession of a Controlled Substance in the Third Degree: Possession with the Intent to Sell. PL 220.16(1).

A common felony in New York is Criminal Possession of a Controlled Substance in the Third Degree, or Possession with the Intent to Sell (New York Penal Law Section 220.16[1]). Interestingly, possessing a controlled substance with the intent to sell it is a Class B felony, which means that it is just as a serious as selling a small quantity of a controlled substance (see Criminal Sale of a Controlled Substance in the Third Degree, PL 220.39 [sentencing chart]). There is no minimum weight or amount of drugs required under this crime. Indeed, one can be found guilty of this crime even when he possesses a miniscule amount of drugs, so long as the prosecution can prove that the person intended to sell those drugs.

understanding possession with intent to sell

The intent element of this crime can be proven in several different ways. For example, evidence of contemporaneous drug sales can be used to prove that the drugs recovered by the police were intended for sale. Sometimes, undercover officers may observe individuals make several suspicious hand-to-hand exchanges on the sidewalk with apparent drug buyers. If the police later arrest such a seller without apprehending any of the apparent buyers, they will be unable to charge the seller with any drug sales. However, if the police discover drugs in the seller’s possession, they can charge the seller with the equally serious possession with the intent to sell. See People v. Cox, 246 A.D.2d 362 (1st Dept. 1998) (noting that evidence of uncharged and contemporaneous drug sales were highly probative of the defendant’s intent to sell).

The intent element can also be inferred, in some cases, by the quantity of controlled substance recovered in the suspect’s possession. Although there is no bright line rule or minimum amount, if the quantity in the person’s possession exceeds what might be considered a quantity fit for personal use, then a jury may be able to find that the person intended to sell it. See People v. Alvino, 71 N.Y.2d 233, 245 (1987); People v. Patchen, 46 A.D.3d 1112, 1113 (3d Dept. 2007). But see People v. McCoy, 873 N.Y.S.2d 372 (3d Dept. 2009).

Of course, if a person possesses a very large quantity of a controlled substance, they may also be subject to other felony charges (see e.g. Criminal Possession of a Controlled Substance in the First Degree, Penal Law Section 220.21; Criminal Possession of a Controlled Substance in the Second Degree, Penal Law Section 220.18; Criminal Possession of a Controlled Substance in the Third Degree, Penal Law Section 220.16[8]; Criminal Possession of a Controlled Substance in the Fourth Degree, Penal Law Section 220.09; Criminal Possession of a Controlled Substance in the Fifth Degree, Penal Law Section 220.06). Further explanations of these quantity-based charges are available here.

The intent element can also be proven by the packaging of the controlled substance or by other paraphernalia in the person’s possession. For example, one’s guilt of this charge may be shown where the controlled substances are individually packaged in small amounts meant for distribution to multiple buyers, or where the person has a quantity of a controlled substance and numerous small empty bags or vials seemingly waiting to be filled for sale. But see People v. Sanchez, 86 N.Y.2d 27, 35 (1995); People v. Martinez, 228 A.D.2d 185 (1st Dept. 1996) (no intent to sell where only a small amount of money and drugs and no sales-like packaging).

Other paraphernalia sometimes considered to be evidence of the intent to sell include large quantities of cash in small denominations, multiple cell phones, tin foil, razors, or a weapon such as a firearm. See People v. Jones, 47 A.D.3d 961, 963 (3d Dept. 2008); People v. Hawkins, 45 A.D.3d 989 (3d Dept. 2007).

Finally, the intent element can always be proven with statements made by the suspect. The possessor of the controlled substances might make an incriminating statement to an undercover officer, on a wiretapped telephone, or even to a prosecutor in an interview. See e.g. People v. Henry, 73 A.D.3d 1391 (3d Dept. 2010).

If you find yourself charged with possession with intent to sell or are looking to appeal a conviction for such a charge, you should speak to an experienced criminal attorney about defending drug charges of PL 220.16, or appealing a conviction for a drug or narcotics offense.

Client Reviews

I found myself in such a dark place thinking only God could understand and help me through this horrible situation. But Matthew Galluzzo did. And he did so in a very kind, compassionate and respectful manner. Enough said.


Matthew Galluzzo saved the day when the unthinkable happened. Every phone call was returned within minutes. All email correspondences were replied to expeditiously. Matt handled our case as if it was a member of his own family in the courtroom. Despite all the obstacles along the way, Matt's legal...


In less than an hour of assessing my case, Mr. Galluzzo had a clear direction and evoked a confident demeanor that was infectious. During the course of several court appearances he was always prepared, and took more than a personal interest when errors in court procedure occurred. Mr. Galluzzo...


We hired Matt when my son was arrested on several very serious felony charges. Matt is not only very knowledgeable about the law, he genuinely cares about his clients. He was patient and professional, inside the courtroom and out, in what turned out to be a very long process. He worked closely with...


Get in Touch

  1. 1 Over 20 Years of Experience
  2. 2 Available 24/7
  3. 3 We Fight for You!
Fill out the contact form or call us at (212) 344-5180 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message